Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 2541 - 2560 of 93,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 4:11 pm by Steven Boutwell
Whether a federal court applying Grable to a case removed from state court must accept a colorable, purely state-law claim as sufficient to establish that the case does not “necessarily raise” a federal issue, even if the court believes the state court would ultimately reject the purely state-law basis for the claim on its merits. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm by Jon
Douglas, in his concurring opinion in the companion case Doe V. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
However, the 9th Circuit ruled, the collateral-order doctrine does not extend to the denials of motions to dismiss based on state-action immunity, because the latter doctrine only provides immunity from liability; it does not immunize a state or local government from being sued at all. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:03 am
Levine, the Supreme Court held, 6-3, that federal approval of warnings on prescription drug labels does not preempt state law tort suits alleging that such... [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:01 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Does a community college stand in the shoes of the state for the purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit? [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:44 am by Immigration Prof
In Department of State v/ Munoz, the Supreme Court today held that a citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
The issue within North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust is: Does... [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:32 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:17 pm by constitutional lawblogger
A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 3:43 am by tortsprof
In April, the Third Circuit ruled that the FAA does not preempt state law standards in aviation products liability; FAA standards do not eliminate the possibility of a design defect: The Appeals Court turned to a federal case, Abdullah v.... [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Matthew Storman and John Does 1-10 United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed September 10, 2019 […] [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:51 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, holding that section 924(c)'s requirement of consecutive sentences does not apply when conviction is under section 924(j). [read post]