Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 11,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Some loose yet interesting stuff that I came across recently during a long stroll around the internet that never made it into a post of its own.A Smashing Good TimeThe Appellate Division,4th Department, held in Franklin Corp v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
Valuing a firm’s interest in contingency-fee cases has spawned years of dispute in Capizzi v Brown Chiari (discussed here). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 11:31 am
In CASE OF JANSONS v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Here are the most popular posts over the past few months. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:56 am
Gaver v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 5:26 pm
In East of Eden Cannabis Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am
The court was unconvinced by Montana’s argument under Locke v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
” Judge Miller cited United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
This said, a collection of multiple NFTs is actually a collection of multiple, non-fungible, products similar in kind to a physical product produced and sold in a series although within a limited edition.As a sidenote, it is also worth noting that the forthcoming EU Market in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA) states that “the issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered as an indicator of their fungibility” (Recital 6c, last… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 1:03 pm
Of course, other Supreme Court precedents, like Oregon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
But the case is more interesting than that, as the trial court also accused plaintiffs' lawyers of screwing around to get the case into federal court.Plaintiffs may have had good reason to abandon their federal claims in this case because the Second Circuit held in Chowdhury v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:58 am
Uh, well, we mean, um, that was interesting. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 1:21 am
I doubt that those motions will put an end to the proceedings in district court, but it will, at minimum, be interesting to read the parties' legal argument at the summary judgment stage, and a streamlining of the case is less unrealistic than a complete rejection of the complaints.Here's the filing the parties made with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia yesterday:United States and 36 States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
The justices relisted Stokes v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm
An upcoming law review article highlights the “missed opportunity” presented by the Jones GPS tracking case: It’s Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
USA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:34 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:52 am
Illumina has renewed interest in this nerdy issue of patent prior art. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:37 am
Sibert is even upset with full-time female doctors who practice a few hours less a week than male counterparts or see a few less patients a week. [read post]
