Search for: "People v. House" Results 2541 - 2560 of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 3:22 am by INFORRM
In order to obtain an anonymised injunction against the press (even a “super-injunction”) numerous people have to know the identity of the claimant for it to be enforced: at the very least the Claimant, any media who have the story (including the editor, news desk, and in-house legal team), the Court (including not just the judge but the court ushers), and both sides’ lawyers. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
This week, Senate and House members have introduced a bill to impose term limits, regularized confirmation schedules, and other changes. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
The Fourth Amendment guarantees that the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:31 am
The Fourth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 1:00 am by jacquig
Or - I like to take them to church on Sunday and to get there we need to leave the house by 5.30 at the latest. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
The argument against your position, he told Nielson, is that the way in which the FHFA carries out its responsibility has a “profound effect” on the housing market and therefore on ordinary people. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the  Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31 Barkas concerned a playing field in Helredale, Whitby, North Yorkshire, on land owned by Scarborough Borough Council, who maintained the Field as “recreation grounds” pursuant to the Housing Act 1985, s 12(1) and its predecessor statutes. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
LaFave, Search and Seizure 307, § 11.4(c) (4th ed. 2004) (quoting People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
 They're (rightly) required by statute to provide services to people in emergency need, regardless of ability to pay. [read post]