Search for: "People v. Young"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 4,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
Most people associate the Liebeck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:23 pm
The second trend is the "for the children" excuse that no law ought to be questioned if its intent is to protect young people. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
: Rights and Remedies after State v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:32 am
France (Ashby Donald) and Fredrik Neij and Peter Sunde Kolmisoppi v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Rory O’Hare, Senior Counsel at New Balance even mentioned blockchain technology being used by New Balance to trace and verify the authenticity of some severely limited edition sneakers (face it, you don’t understand young people anymore). [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:28 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:19 am
Ginsberg v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:56 am
V; Marbury v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
The rule operates as an irrebuttable presumption that a marriage between young people, one of whom is not a UK national, is a forced marriage. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Eliminating this term from the Family Court Act is intended to send a positive message and assist in the efforts to achieve full equality and empowerment for girls, young women, and people of color.Determination to calculate income by applying reasonable rate of return to entire tort settlement award not an improvident exercise of discretion In Matter of Gerghty v Muniz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1287197 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
