Search for: "White v. United States" Results 2541 - 2560 of 7,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Croson Co., the Court struck down the City of Richmond’s minority and female-owned business program as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
During the announcement in the White House Rose Garden, Barrett promised that “should I be confirmed, I will be mindful who came before me,” and added that “the flag of the United States is still flying at half-staff in memory of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to mark the end of a great American life. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm by Greta Ravitsky and Tammy Tran
  Citing the Supreme Court of the United States, the majority opinion notes that the statutory text of Title VII is not limited to economic or tangible discrimination. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Paul Clement
Take, for example, Justice Stevens’ solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Ashby Jones
(Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:10 am
United States as support for her claim that adverse possession is available only as an affirmative defense. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:48 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1997), the United States Supreme Court held that disparate treatment occurs when "the employer simply treats some people less favorably than others because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 2:44 am by Matt Kaiser
That’s the question which was answered in the Sixth Circuit’s United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Remember Division 30, you know, the group of Syrian rebels trained by the United States as the ground force to defeat ISIS? [read post]