Search for: "White v. United States" Results 2541 - 2560 of 6,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by Alain Leibman
United States, 390 U.S. 39, 53 (1968) (privilege available when invoker “is confronted by substantial and ‘real’ . . . hazards of incriminating); Hoffman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
“The court explained that the 14th Amendment required ‘that the law in the states shall be the same as for the black as for the white. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 2:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm
White, the United States Supreme Court held that even if the employer action didn't quite amount to an "ultimate employment decision" (such as failure to hire, demotion, or termination), it could still constitute adverse employment action under Title VII. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:30 pm
While listening to Bob Marley&rsquo;s &ldquo;No Woman No Cry&rdquo; on the famous white sand beaches of Negril, Jamaica, the defendant decided to remove the case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey under CAFA. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Wyoming, “an Indian treaty-rights case argued in the Supreme Court last Tuesday, revolves around a basic of federal Indian law: No promise to Indian people actually binds the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
" It's clear that Diemert found RSJI messaging incorrect and offensive: he testified that he believes white privilege does not exist and is an "incorrect stereotype"; that it is offensive to state that the United States was built on a system of white supremacy; and that it is offensive to state that it is not appropriate to be color-blind when it comes to race. [read post]