Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
"The historical differences between Scottish and English Law, and what it means for Brexit" (BBC History Extra). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:19 pm
Two of the dissenters in Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm
Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
This doctrine has historical roots in American and English common law. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:03 am
NTPC v Singer states that in the absence of an express choice, the substantive law of arbitration would be the same as that of the contract. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am
All suits and actions arising under this Agreement shall be brought in the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA and License hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States District Courts Sitting in Virginia. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
By Eric SegallIn the iconic case Marbury v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
The Court will distance itself from U.S. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:51 pm
You can read the entire judgment in the original Dutch here, or lovingly translated into English here. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
This judgment Re Murray (deceased) Crummer v AAI Limited ABN 2020 QSC 155 dealt with the meaning of a householder’s liability policy exclusion for liability for death or injury of anyone who usually lives at the insured address. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In any event, the Court of Appeal stated that Andrew Smith J's decision was plainly correct and that a single arbitrator should have been appointed.This case highlights the consistent approach of the English courts in seeking to minimise appeals arising from arbitrations under the Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:28 am
This judgment Re Murray (deceased) Crummer v AAI Limited ABN 2020 QSC 155 dealt with the meaning of a householder’s liability policy exclusion for liability for death or injury of anyone who usually lives at the insured address. [read post]
