Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:30 pm
On Monday, May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its highly anticipated opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm
But there was no reference at all to this position in Channel 5’s programme, which portrayed the Claimants as “ordinary private people”. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
That would have been the end of the matter, but for the House of Lords, which decided in the combined case of A v Hoare to reverse its own decision in Stubbings (1COR’s Lizanne Gumbel QC was for most of the appellants although not Mr Hoare). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:46 pm
For example, in People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:05 am
Supreme Court held in its 2020 opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:04 am
The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:44 am
The bill passed through Alabama’s Republican dominated House of Representatives and Senate with overwhelming majorities. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31 Barkas concerned a playing field in Helredale, Whitby, North Yorkshire, on land owned by Scarborough Borough Council, who maintained the Field as “recreation grounds” pursuant to the Housing Act 1985, s 12(1) and its predecessor statutes. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
James Curry (Circuit);Corey Cawthon v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
The argument against your position, he told Nielson, is that the way in which the FHFA carries out its responsibility has a “profound effect” on the housing market and therefore on ordinary people. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
Or - I like to take them to church on Sunday and to get there we need to leave the house by 5.30 at the latest. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:59 am
Constitution guarantees [t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:31 am
The Fourth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
The Fourth Amendment guarantees that the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
