Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 2561 - 2580 of 30,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Well, probably not the only one"The Real Problem With Police Video" Should police control the footage? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
  He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
    In January, CalBizLit posted about then scheduled argument in People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
And perhaps that is what actually happened; and if so, the Supreme Court’s majority is surely right that that is precluded by AEDPA and Jackson v Virginia. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:03 pm
Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (2003) , the court finds that based on the record before it the District Court could not have determined that the disputed people didn't look like employees. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 7:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Most people in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Azle, Willow Park, Hudson Oaks, Brock, Millsap, Cool, Springtown, or anywhere else in Parker County would not have a very good idea how under insured motorist (UIM) works. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm
 But when someone's expressly invited, well, that's different; they can sue.That makes sense. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:29 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Sweeping Executive authority, for example, is nothing new.” Follow the link for the horrifying story of U.S. v. [read post]