Search for: "Adoption of Barnett" Results 241 - 260 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
If adopted, search engines and social media platforms would have to make formal disclosures about any practice that shapes internet traffic. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:23 am by Daniel Gilman
… In the statement …the agency has now adopted this “just trust us” approach as a permanent operating principle. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Also at Volokh, Randy Barnett previews an upcoming panel hosted by the Georgetown Law Journal on McDonald v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
” In a new paper, Kent Barnett, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Georgia School of Law, Christina L. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm by Kevin Funnell
The standard was meant to repeal the agency's sweeping 2004 preemption rules, returning it to the so-called 'Barnett standard' established by the 1996 Supreme Court case of Barnett V. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Guest Author
EPA, the Supreme Court held that the emission limits adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Clean Power Plan exceeded the agency’s authority, because the Clean Air Act did not clearly authorize the agency to “restructure the American energy market. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:05 pm by Leigh Anne Schriever
Its recommendation builds on a number of other recommendations ACUS has adopted in the past several years. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:43 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
For more on the handling of the Necessary & Proper Clause in this case, I recommend these posts outlining the views of Jason Mazzone, Kurt Lash, and Randy Barnett. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ironically, today’s vociferous critics of the Constitution and the Framers have adopted the views of the justly maligned Roger Taney. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm by JB
This is a central claim of New Originalists like Randy Barnett, Larry Solum, and myself. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
  These restrictions would be unconsitutional if adopted by a government entity. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
”Although adopted early in the Convention, the language of Resolution VI was never added to the Constitution. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:47 am by John McFarland
I expect that this bill arose from problems in the urban areas of the Barnett Shale in and around Fort Worth, where most homeowners own the minerals under their lot. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:42 pm by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Not only has Balkin failed to rebut Randy Barnett, he has relied upon a reference to Roger Sherman’s principle which was expressly rejected by the convention. [read post]