Search for: "Appeal of Hawes"
Results 241 - 260
of 353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 1:49 pm
Haw. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 2:13 pm
The Virginia Court of Appeals relied on United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Haw! [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
P'ship, 198 P.3d 615, 644 (Haw. 2008) ("However, both [Haw. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
Haw. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:53 pm
Revisiting the issue of speech at shopping malls, the California Court of Appeal (2d District) held in Best Friends Animal Society v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
Supreme Court is equally valid in Hawaii appellate courts, especially now that the Intermediate Court of Appeals is the court of first appeal and the Hawaii Supreme Court is a discretionary review court. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Ferm, 7 P.3d 193, 197 (Haw. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Under this approach, Axis Sally, Tokyo Rose, any other American equivalent of the British Lord Haw-Haw, and others would be constitutionally immune from punishment. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 3:41 pm
Corp. of Hawaii, 117 Haw. 174, 177 P.3d 884 (Jan. 31, 2008). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:13 am
See Haw. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
Haw. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
The Court of Appeals got it wrong. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
Rather, the trial court construed New Hampshire law as allowing a design defect claim based on pure risk utility factors without any need for an alternative design, and the First Circuit converted that theory on appeal to the “remove-from-the-market” claim that the Supreme Court actually granted certiorari to review. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:04 pm
After all, if there wasn’t a burden, why go through all the hemming and hawing about finding a new compromise, one that doesn’t require any notice? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:28 am
(OK, there are many things one could say about Wikipedia and its omissions, but how about: if you hemmed and hawed over considering the film on a motion to dismiss, what is this discussion doing here? [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Dep’t of Transp., 115 Haw. 299, 167 P.3d 292 (2007) (secondary effects of improvements to public transportation infrastructure are not exempt from environmental assessment). [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
Haw. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
Chair of Zoning Board of Appeals, 949 P.2d 183, 86 Haw. 343 (Haw.App. 1997)).Indeed, Ord. 864’s article regarding uses of non-ag-land single-family TVRs rendered non-conforming by the ordinance reflects this limitation by grandfathering otherwise legal dwelling units that were “being used as a vacation rental on an ongoing basis prior to the effective date of this ordinance. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:14 am
This is the third case in this series, the second of which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
