Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 241 - 260
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
In a 38-page opinion filed May 4, and belatedly ordered published on May 25, 2017, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment dismissing a writ petition filed by three environmental groups alleging CEQA violations against the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) in connection with its issuance of 214 individual permits for new oil wells in the long-established South Belridge Oil Field in Kern County. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
In an opinion filed June 28, 2023, and later ordered published on July 25, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) affirmed a judgment granting a writ of mandate setting aside (1) the City of Los Angeles’ (City) approval of a 10-story hotel project (with three levels of subterranean parking) to be located on a half-acre site in the Hollywood Community Plan area, and (2) the City’s accompanying determination that the hotel project was exempt under CEQA’s Class 32… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
CEQA’s Class 32 categorical exemption for “infill development” applies to proposed developments within city limits on sites of five or fewer acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, where the site has no habitat value for special status species, can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services, and the project would not have significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm
In a brief – and somewhat odd – opinion filed April 22, and belatedly ordered partially published on May 20, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a General Plan Amendment (GPA) adopted by the City of Palm Springs as categorically exempt from CEQA. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
“It ain’t over ‘til it’s over. [read post]
