Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 241 - 260
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
“Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:35 pm
In a published decision filed May 28, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed that part of the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and otherwise affirmed the judgment, thus upholding the City of San Diego’s Balboa Park revitalization project (“Project”) against various land use law and CEQA challenges. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In an opinion recently ordered published, the First District Court of Appeal extensively reviewed the relevant case law and expressed skepticism that CEQA would operate in reverse to require analysis of potential impacts on a mixed-use project’s construction workers and future residents from pre-existing soil contamination at the project site. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
On September 13, 2011, I began the endeavor of writing Miller Starr Regalia’s CEQA Developments blog. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
On February 27, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division One) filed its published decision in Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:26 pm
In a published opinion filed January 31, 2018, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial Court’s judgment issuing a writ of mandate voiding the California State Air Resources Board’s (“CARB”) 2014 amendments to its 2008 Truck and Bus Regulation and its related environmental review documents, which were the functional equivalent of a negative declaration under CARB’s certified regulatory program. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
In a published decision filed October 31, 2014 (Paulek v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:40 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The 2021-2022 Legislative Session was light on CEQA amendments, and once again did not produce any significant reform. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case we’ve been following involving CEQA’s definition of a “project” on the afternoon of June 4, 2019, and took the matter under submission. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:11 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
