Search for: "Arthur F. Coon"
Results 241 - 260
of 448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Like the fable of the blind men and the elephant, CEQA’s prohibition on “piecemealing” of environmental review is animated by a basic recognition that the “whole” of an action under review is greater than its individual parts viewed separately. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
In a unanimous 29-page opinion authored by Associate Justice Carol Corrigan, and filed on March 30, 2017, the California Supreme Court held the City of Newport Beach’s EIR for a large mixed-use development project proposed on a 400-acre coastal zone site failed to comply with CEQA. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
In a 46-page opinion filed February 14 and ordered published on March 15, 2017, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected numerous CEQA challenges to Riverside County’s approval of an EIR for Specific Plan 380, a 200-acre master-planned, mixed-use community in the County’s French Valley region. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:08 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
In an opinion filed November 29, and belatedly ordered published on December 22, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s denial of a writ petition challenging on CEQA grounds the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s (Muni) approval of a light rail construction contract. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
In an opinion filed December 7, and later ordered published on December 16, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition on the “single legal issue” whether plaintiffs were entitled under Public Resources Code § 21151(c) (and a municipal code section with essentially the same content) to an appeal of a planning commission’s “substantial conformance review” (SCR) determination to the city council. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
In a lengthy published opinion filed November 29, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal rejected all legal challenges to the City of San Francisco’s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) and related land use approvals for a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center project on 11 acres in the City’s Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area (the “Project”). [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Such impacts are traditionally measured – as was the case here – with the LOS A to F scale, where A is free flowing and F is congested “stop and go” traffic. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
In a 29-page published opinion filed October 14, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal dispensed some good news to municipalities desiring to reasonably regulate retail medical marijuana facilities within their jurisdictional boundaries. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
“… like all things in life, project plans are subject to change. [read post]
