Search for: "Barrett v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court in large measure in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
The justices invited the acting solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Cummings v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm by Lawrence Solum
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Evan Lee
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am by jonathanturley
There is a major ruling this week in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit where a three-judge panel ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
  If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
§ 1255 – complete the transition to LPR status while remaining in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
“Unlike those cases,” the plaintiffs argue, “this case concerns violations by U.S. citizens from U.S. territory where no foreign state could complain about the United States holding its citizens accountable for such violations. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm by Josh Blackman
The Emoluments Clause was the premier anticorruption clause in the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Hearron gave what I thought were suboptimal answers, but the correct answers ought not to have damaged his overall case.The second set of questions arose in the first case but primarily were discussed in the second one, United States v. [read post]