Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 241 - 260
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 5:54 pm
Big-name liberal constitutional law scholars range from originalists like Akhil Amar, to Bruce Ackerman’s “constitutional moment” approach, to “living Constitution” theories of various types (e.g. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm
This story corrects the narrative put forward by Bruce Ackerman and others that in 1936 the American people faced a choice between the constitutional positions of the President and the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:35 am
Here they are: Floyd Abrams Spencer Ackerman David Addington Mike Allen Michael Anton Kurt Armfeld (?) [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm
In Politico, Bruce Ackerman and Gerard Magliocca wrote: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — the Disqualification Clause — expressly bars any person from holding "any office, civil or military, under the United States" if he "engaged in insurrection" against the Constitution after previously swearing to uphold it "as an officer of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:29 pm
Americans should be aware that, as Bruce Ackerman puts it, "[t]his isn't the way we do things in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:21 am
At the Huffington Post, Bruce Ackerman asks whether the Court is “about to declare war on the twentieth century,” considering this question in light of the Court’s decision last June in the Affordable Care Act case, this Term’s Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 7:28 am
I argue that a theory of constitutional change that focuses on how the Constitution is implemented through institutions over time amid the tensions between the "written" and the "unwritten," the "legal" and the "political," offers a better approach to understanding the Bush presidency than the major alternative theories offered by Karl Llewellyn, Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:28 pm
If we cannot have more robust institutional reform of the kind Bruce Ackerman suggests—a Senate confirmable executive tribunal whose members serve as independent judges for the executive branch—we can at least have a fully functioning independent institution as Johnsen argues. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:26 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 1:51 pm
Now I'm a legal practitioner, not an academic or scholar, but I actually have a Sunstein number: Sunstein 4, through the chain Sunstein - John Yoo or Bruce Ackerman [either one works -- and John Yoo is a very odd person to be in my Sunstein chain!] [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:57 am
I have watched them teach; I have watched them prepare themselves to teach; I have watched them impart a sense of the ethics of dispassion, open-mindedness and hard work to their students; I have watched them struggle with difficult intellectual assignments; I have heard them talk coherently about difficult and important subjects; I have read a considerable amount of their writings; I have written with them; I have served on legislative drafting and other committees with them; I… [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:25 pm
Ranging from particular enthusiasts of "non-originalism," to Ronald Dworkin' s metaphoric likening of the Supreme Court to "Hercules," to Bruce Ackerman's special notion of "non-textual amendments" (i.e., constitutional changes resulting during special "constitutional moments"), and nearly a dozen theories in all, each "theory" advances its own idea of a "living" constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Daniels Trebilcock’s Heresy Owen Fiss Regulation And Public Law In Comparative Perspective Susan Rose-Ackerman Legal Universalism: Persistent Objections Kevin E. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:07 am
(Bruce Ackerman outlined the problem about a decade ago.)But, whatever we end up thinking about the constitutionality of a consumption tax, Chafetz's throwaway line certainly doesn't advance the ball. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
But as Bruce Ackerman captured in his pioneering Harvard Law Review piece, The New Separation of Powers, this is not always the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am
UPDATE: Here is some additional commentary from Bruce Ackerman, Lawrence Tribe, and Adam White. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
This story corrects the narrative put forward by Bruce Ackerman and others that in 1936 the American people faced a choice between the constitutional positions of the President and the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:46 pm
I argue that a theory of constitutional change that focuses on how the Constitution is implemented through institutions over time amid the tensions between the "written" and the "unwritten," the "legal" and the "political," offers a better approach to understanding the Bush presidency than the major alternative theories offered by Karl Llewellyn, Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 6:46 am
Bruce Ackerman has written on this alarming view of military control apparently endorsed by the news pages of the New York Times. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
Ok Governor, I think I grok you:Don't be angry - don't be sadDon't sit crying over good times you've hadThere's a girl right next to youAnd she's just waiting for something to doSpeaking of lovin' the one you're with, Michael Hanzman has gone and done it again -- effective July 1, he will be of counsel to his buddy Scott Link at Ackerman, Link & Sartory, P.A.And his former partner and permanent citrus crusader Bobby Gilbert is now teamed up… [read post]
