Search for: "Cole v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 1,206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation     [1] R v Cole and R v Jarvis [2] That offence is committed where a person surreptitiously observes or makes a visual recording of another person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose [3] Jones v Tsige The post Can Your Boss Access Your Computer Personal Records? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Judge Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court in Manhattan, a former member of the National Commission on Forensic Science, said the weakest pattern analysis fields rely more on examiner intuition than science. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Freistein: The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently however, the Saskatchewan legislature has also invoked the notwithstanding clause in Bill 89 –The School Choice Protection Act/Loi sur la protection du choix d’école,[7] introduced on May 30, 2018. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 10:43 pm by Mark Tushnet
Maybe Super's objections to an Article V convention are well-taken. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Akhil Amar, ACLU national legal director David Cole, and myself, among others. [read post]