Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
Perhaps the biggest news out of the Court yesterday was created by Noah Newkirk of Los Angeles, who interrupted the oral arguments to protest the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:25 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Albritton v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:17 am
This law does not fairly apply to all citizens. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 2:04 pm
The author of "Public Use and Public Purpose after Kelo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
O’Brien v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Stauffer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:18 pm
In Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
The North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA), a public agency established by state law, contracted with Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company (NWPRC) to allow NWPRC to conduct freight services on tracks controlled by NCRA. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Plaintiff James Dean, Inc. filed a trademark complaint against Twitter, as well as the fictitious persons, John Doe Defendants 1-5 Company, in an Indiana state court. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
In Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
By the same 6-3 vote, the court ruled that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishments” does not bar punishing homeless people for sleeping in public, even when they have nowhere else to go. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
Citizen, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
