Search for: "Confidential, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
Atas, 2021 ONSC 670 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recognised a new tort of harassment in internet communications. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:04 am
In a decision that recognizes the importance of fostering informal mentorship, the Ontario Superior Court held (in 1623242 Ontario Inc. v Great Lakes Copper Inc., 2014 ONSC 782 (CanLII) ) that a lawyer who provides a general opinion about the state of the law to a colleague without being privy to the specific details of the colleague’s case or the identity of his or her client and is later retained by a client opposed in interest to the… [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:35 pm
In a decision that recognizes the importance of fostering informal mentorship, the Ontario Superior Court held (in 1623242 Ontario Inc. v Great Lakes Copper Inc., 2014 ONSC 782 (CanLII) ) that a lawyer who provides a general opinion about the state of the law to a colleague without being privy to the specific details of the colleague’s case or the identity of his or her client and is later retained by a client opposed in interest to the… [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Morales v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Morales v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
And there certainly was no indication he received anything more than the job itself.The Appellate Court of Illinois (Second District) weighed in somewhat in Paul Joseph Salon & Spa, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:57 am
In World Financial Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm
" Kneebinding, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:58 am
In Sevatec Holdings Inc. v Octo Platform Equity Holdings, LLC, C.A. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
” The court rejected the patient’s anti-SLAPP motion because the remarks were provably false, not just opinions. * Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:43 am
According to court records in Sony DADC US Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 11:06 am
" When the court grants relief, as the Superior Court did here, provisions of Penal Code section 851.92 then apply. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 7:37 am
SOTO), ET AL. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
Superior Court, 96 Cal. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
IPSO 03456-24 Tyler v Worcester News, 14 Confidential Sources, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation 03496-24 Newcastle Building Society v The Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 04556-24 Mitchison v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, Resolved – satisfactory remedy Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the past week.… [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County, Docket P- 250777-16. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm
Print Direction, Inc., __ S.E.2d __, 2011 WL 4469712 (Georgia Court of Appeals 2011), and this is how it arose: [Print Direction, Inc. [read post]
