Search for: "Cotton v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
In June 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a District Court abused its discretion in issuing an injunction in a case involving GM alfalfa, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo (sixth relist); Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:37 am
First, there is the claim that "even popcorn sellers are struggling to stay alive" in light the current state of Canadian copyright law. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:39 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:52 am
Hall v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:52 am
Hall v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity case involving a man shot after police made a mistake typing in a license plate, and Martinez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:58 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
" In January the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a previous Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that the Clean Water Act did not regulate pesticide application "into, over, or near ‘waters of the United States'" as long as EPA labeling requirements were followed.The Sixth Circuit ruled in "National Cotton Council v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The great state of Oklahoma is not O.K. with the Tenth Circuit’s holding that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals clearly violated Beck v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:36 am
Also, in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
(citing NP Anderson Cotton Exch., L.P. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
