Search for: "Dean v. Davis"
Results 241 - 260
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
., in Fullilove v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
Davis (06-666), although the ruling produced seven opinions. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
In one action last Monday, the Court denied the request for review (known as a petition for a writ of certiorari) in the case filed by the Pennsylvania Republican Party (Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
It seems the Supreme Court will soon decide whether to grant review in the very significant case in which Republican challengers argue that the North Carolina Supreme Court overstepped federal constitutional bounds when it invalidated—as being inconsistent with the state constitution’s prohibitions on excessive partisanship—the congressional districting done by the North Carolina elected legislature. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
