Search for: "District of Columbia v. Armes" Results 241 - 260 of 1,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 8:27 am by Christine Corcos
An individual right to “keep and bear arms” for purposes unrelated to militia or military service was not recognized until the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision, applying what it took to be the original meaning of the Second Amendment, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 am
An individual right to “keep and bear arms” for purposes unrelated to militia or military service was not recognized until the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision, applying what it took to be the original meaning of the Second Amendment, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:14 am by admin
Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
The city of Washington's appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am by William Ford
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed House Republicans’ lawsuit seeking to enjoin the use of the House of Representatives’s proxy voting system. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
District of Columbia on the same day the story ran. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
District of Columbia, entry dated Sept. 25, 2007.) [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:55 pm
  Here is the abstract:In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm by Julie McGrain
March 4, 2011).With respect to Barton's facial challenge, the Third Circuit concluded that it was bound by the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
The gun case (District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:44 am
" In other words, the Supreme Court will tackle the knotty question of whether to extend the landmark holding of District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:20 pm
For its part, the District of Columbia attracted a group of five states as amici (three of which have no state constitutional right to arms), as well as Puerto Rico. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm by David Kopel
Indeed, the Supreme Court rejected essentially the same argument in Heller—that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban did not unconstitutionally burden the right to self-defense because the law permitted the possession of long guns for home defense. [read post]