Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 241 - 260
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Regents of the University of California, which was alternately focused on the administrative-law wrinkles in the case and more sweeping sentiments about immigration law and policy. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1130.) [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm
The California Court of Appeal, in Horsford v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
The California Court of Appeal, in Horsford v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:04 pm
Save Our Heritage Organisation v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Even for its supposed beneficiaries, affirmative action probably does more harm than good. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Cal.) in Frankel v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Board of Regents,[4] a case decided before New York law expressly prohibited fee-splitting. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405.) [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:28 pm
Regents of the University of California blocking the government from terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (i.e., “DACA”). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1129; Pub. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Most notably, New York and fifteen other states, and the District of Columbia, filed suitin the Eastern District of New York; and the Regents of the University of California filed suitin the Northern District of California, together with former DHS Secretary Napolitano, who is now President of the University of California. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, the appellate court said, “Although the level of detail will vary depending upon an alternative's potential for feasibility, in every case, the EIR must disclose the ‘analytic route the…agency traveled from evidence to action. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:26 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, the appellate court said, “Although the level of detail will vary depending upon an alternative's potential for feasibility, in every case, the EIR must disclose the ‘analytic route the…agency traveled from evidence to action. [read post]
