Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 9:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm
Strezovski and others v North Macedonia (App. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 3:35 pm
In Medek v. [read post]
Recommended Reading: Following the Direction of TrafFix: Trade Dress Law and Functionality Revisited
14 Jul 2010, 2:30 am
In an article in the latest issue of IDEA (published by Franklin Pierce Law School) entitled "Following the Direction of TrafFix: Trade Dress Law and Functionality Revisited," Professor Amy Cohen of Western New England College School of Law reviews the history of product configuration trade dress law, including its expansion in the 1980s through the Supreme Court's attempt in TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In Darren Bent v (1) Highways and Utilities Construction Ltd; (2) Allianz Insurance Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 292, the Court of Appeal was asked to order a retrial of the first instance decision of Mr Justice Yelton sitting in Cambridge County Court.The case concerned the hire in February 2007, by Darren Bent (the Sunderland and England striker), of an Aston Martin DB9, worth approximately £105,000, following an accident caused by an Allianz policyholder which resulted in damage to… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
In Darren Bent v (1) Highways and Utilities Construction Ltd; (2) Allianz Insurance Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 292, the Court of Appeal was asked to order a retrial of the first instance decision of Mr Justice Yelton sitting in Cambridge County Court.The case concerned the hire in February 2007, by Darren Bent (the Sunderland and England striker), of an Aston Martin DB9, worth approximately £105,000, following an accident caused by an Allianz policyholder which resulted in damage to… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
In the case of Nicholas G Jones v (1) Environcom Limited and (2) Environcom England Limited [2009] EWHC 16 the Commercial Court was asked to determine, as a preliminary issue, whether a claimant insurer could be granted an application for security of its costs. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Norris (Chancery Division, England and Wales) gave his ruling in Burrows v Smith, Crush Digital Media Ltd [2010] EWHC 22 (Ch), an interesting little copyright/breach of confidence dispute. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
England and Wales End of life care, “best interests”: JB. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
She then decided to bring a claim for financial relief under English law on the basis that she had purchased a property in England in 2014 and, since 2017, had been living in England permanently. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
When asked about this case Google Bard said Gupta v British Broadcasting Corporation was a defamation case in the High Court of England and Wales. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Ellis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:59 am
Brian Cordery and Matthew RaynorOn 29 November 2019, the Patents Court of England and Wales handed down it decision revoking Conversant’s UK patent relating to an improved user interface on smartphone devices. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
In Radmacher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Strike out – When considering whether the defendant has a ‘real prospect’ of successfully defending the claim, ‘The criterion which the judge has to apply under CPR Part 24 is not one of probability; it is absence of reality’ (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No.3) [2001] 2 All ER 513). [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
The right to sue in defamation has been extended to cover trading corporations (South Hetton Coal Co Ltd v North Eastern News Association Ltd. [1894] 1 QB 133), and trade unions (National Union of General and Municipal Workers v Gillian [1946] KB 81). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:21 pm
In R. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
In two separate judgments, 29 July 2010 and 18 May 2011, the Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals of Perry and others v Serious Organised Crime Agency. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As the Supreme Court has become more conservative, the justices have grown less likely to defer to federal agencies under the 1984 precedent in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
