Search for: "FCA Holdings, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qIisfUtxY5 -> District Court Rejects Plaintiffs' Narrow Construction of the Term “User” under DMCA https://t.co/t04II91AdL -> The Copyright License As a Property Right http://t.co/5OSSPV9wwo -> Lin to decision in Minden Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
One mea culpa for our last installment: Turns out we were Telling Lies when we said that False Claims Act (FCA) case AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Industrielle Alliance, Assurance et Services Financiers Inc., 2017 FCA 80 (37642) Were witnesses’ language rights infringed during a Tax Court case? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am by Eric
CSC Holdings, Inc, 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008). 2. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm by Matt Turetzky
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc., 750 F.3d 111, 111 (1st Cir. 2014) (holding that a case must be dismissed under FCA’s “first-to-file” bar because complaints were filed against the same defendants regarding the same drugs with the same nationwide scope using the same mechanisms of off-label promotion to defraud Medicaid). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
: Alcon Inc v Bausch & Lomb (Australia) Pty Ltd (ipwars) FCA: Infringing a registered design? [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
Supp.2d 259, 266 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (rejecting FCA claims attacking off-label use). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP finance)   Australia Trade mark use: We need a more balanced solution – FCA decision in Alcon v Bausch & Lomb (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCA on trade marks as security for costs: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (ipwars) Minister for Innovation decides not to change regulatory regime for books – publishers keep territorial exclusivity (LawFont) (Managing Intellectual Property) Non-English language publications may not be… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2020 FCA 79; 2021 SCC 51 (39220) Does a parent corporation conduct business with its controlled foreign affiliate when it provides capital and exercises corporate oversight? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Patently-O) 8th Circuit: Federal Circuit does not hold appellate jurisdiction over a refusal to compel arbitration in a patent case: Industrial Wire Products, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Adjudicators on one side do not consider themselves bound by the holdings on the other side. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:10 am by Jill L. Rosenberg
See e.g., Hispanics United of Buffalo, Inc., NLRB, 03-CA-027872 (Dec. 14, 2012). [read post]
The possible consequences of such errors include (1) violating payor policies or requirements, leading to allegations of fraud, (2) Medicaid payment holds and referral to state Medicaid fraud control units (state attorneys general), and (3) liability for overpayments, including liability under the False Claims Act for improper retention of overpayments. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
Rockwell arises from the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Utzig Holdings (B.C.) [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Kocwa v Twitter Inc [2020] QDC 252, an application for an interlocutory injunction concerning a number of tweets regarding the claimant. [read post]
However, given that the Preamble directly targets treaty-shopping arrangements, it is unclear what the impact of Alta Energy will have on the application of MLI-modified tax treaties go forward. [1] 2018 TCC 152 [2] Article 13(4) of the Luxembourg Treaty. [3] Taking the Minister’s view, drilling or extraction activities would actually have to occur on the property covered by that specific resource license. [4] Alta Energy, at para 68. [5] The general anti-avoidance provision of the Income Tax… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
(Justia), Permanent injunction imposed on the distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software and stronger filtering software required (OUT-LAW), Ninth Circuit Holds Use in Commerce Only Creates Trademark Rights When the Use is Lawful (Intellectual Property Law Blog)Apotex Gets Out of Contempt Holding â€â [read post]