Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 241 - 260 of 15,385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 5:41 am
Hästens chequered figurative markWhen it comes to figurative marks, distinctiveness very often plays a key role in determining whether such a mark is eligible for trade mark registration. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:01 pm by Gina Bongiovi
v=Sbu26eaX0Xg Subscribe to my Video Channel: Bongiovi Law TV The post How to Start a Business in Las Vegas – Video Series appeared first on Bongiovi Law Firm. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:47 am
  The challenge for the Louisiana Supreme Court will be to figure out what the lower court said. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:06 pm
Here is the abstract.2012 marks the 80th anniversary of Donoghue v Stevenson, a case that is frequently cited as the starting-point for a genealogy of negligence. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
An individual exercises his First Amendment right to criticize a public figure. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
Or even low-level "investments," like the ones here, where you're getting five figures from people in your church to market a dubious product on the basis of exceptionally dubious representations. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
We are huge fans of the delicious Alexandra Korry, the high-powered Sullivan & Cromwell partner who figures prominently in Charney v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
"] See here; you can read more about the forgeries, and about other kinds of shenanigans in my Hassell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
14 Jul 2005, 3:21 am
But he said the $27.5 billion figure sought is too high, doubting Congress would authorize such a payout. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm by Jonathan D. Montag
On August 11, 2011, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals published another en banc blockbuster, U.S. v. [read post]