Search for: "General Controls Co. v. Hi-G, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  EPA visited the site in September 2008 and August 2009 and on each occasion observed numerous violations of CWA’s Construction General Permit, including a deficient Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and failure to install and maintain adequate erosion and sediment controls. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
It is, therefore, relevant to note that so much was the value attached to the precedent of the highest court that in The London Street Tramways Co. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
” Just compensation must be sufficient for the owner to be “put in as good a position pecuniarily as if his property had not been taken. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm by Emily Theriault
There is significant overlap in eligibility requirements at a general level, but each small business status is unique, with its own requirements and its own protest process. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.,15 permitted plaintiffs’ expert witness to reanalyze a study by grouping together two previously distinct cancer outcomes to generate a statistically significant result. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Shareholders were represented by co-lead counsel firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. 2.) [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
            Did the trial judge err in failing to hold that the claim was time barred under s. 45(1)(g) of the Limitations Act? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
In a one-page Decision and Order issued last February, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, November 30, 2009 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
The inadmissibility of scientific studies is generally not problematic because Rule 703 permits testifying expert witnesses to formulate opinions based upon facts and data, which are not themselves admissible in evidence. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Gordon Firemark
FBT now alleges that not all money generated by foreign sales of Eminemn songs returns to Aftermath (the division that releases his music) but instead 71% of the revenue is paid to UMG’s foreign affiliates while Aftermath only gets 29%. [read post]