Search for: "Gerard Magliocca"
Results 241 - 260
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 7:08 pm
Googling the question didn't turn up much, except for an interesting post by Gerard Magliocca, who didn't have an answer but posted some almost as interesting questions: There are many states right now (most notably California) that are under fiscal stress. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
Update: Gerard Magliocca, who has done some great recent work on the filibuster and the legislative process generally, calls the talking filibuster "basically a joke" and "entirely symbolic," because the new rule does not eliminate the current two-track system, under which the majority can suspend the "filibustered" matter and move on to other things--and usually does. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:26 am
See blog posts from Dan Filler at the Faculty Lounge,Gerard Magliocca at ConOp, and Jesse Hill at Prawfs. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
” Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca ponders Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ use of the term “bad law. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
On Friday, Kiera covered a proposal by Gerard Magliocca at Concurring Opinions for circuit judges to sit by designation on the Court when a Justice is recused. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:54 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca raises a curious hypothetical: could four Justices effectively “filibuster” by refusing to participate in a case and so depriving the Court of a quorum? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:11 am
(Have I spoken recently about Gerard Magliocca's really good book on constitutional thought in the age of Jackson? [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:19 pm
(H/t Gerard Magliocca, who is the person who suggested I take this picture some years back.) [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 8:40 am
As reported by Gerard Magliocca at Balkinization, the university Board of Regents have ordered an audit to “decide how or if the press will continue to operate. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am
While Lyle predicts that “the chances that [the Court] will grant this request appear to be remote to non-existent,” Gerard Magliocca of Concurring Opinions argues that “there is no good reason for the Court to deny this request. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
” The blog Concurring Opinions provided extended commentary on the case, which included posts from Margot Kaminski, Gerard Magliocca, Derek Bambauer, and Priscilla Smith, Nabiha Syed, and Albert Wong. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Another interesting case you’ve never heard of” summarizing the 1947 decision in Kotch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Gerard Magliocca discusses the extension (and its possible implications) at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
” Gerard Magliocca of Concurring Opinions highlights the accomplishments of Justice Arthur Goldberg, who resigned from the Court after just three years to become Ambassador to the United Nations. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm
Gerard Magliocca, one of the leading academic experts on Section 3, provided valuable insights on the historical record. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 3:53 pm
Lash's article responds to recent publications by Will Baude and Mike Paulsen, Mark Graber, Gerard Magliocca, and others. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
At Balkinization, Gerard Magliocca contends that “people are entitled to know how the Justices vote on each cert petition,” while the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times renews the calls for cameras in the courtroom. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
At Concurring Opinions, Gerard Magliocca analyzes the decision; he argues that although “the panel majority really wants to say that any ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional,” it “came up with a narrower rationale” based on its “concern that the Supreme Court will not agree. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
Lawprof Gerard Magliocca gave the heads up to the new, lengthy article in his post at Concurring Opinions, where he offers that he’s rarely shocked, but this one got to him: The New York criminal justice system (at least in the City) should be deeply ashamed. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Drew Singer and Terry Baynes of Thomson Reuters report that a “more nuanced interpretation of the ruling’s impact has begun to emerge in discussions on legal blogs, among lawyers and in the country’s ivory towers.” Julie Rovner of NPR reviews the decision, while Gerard Magliocca offers his “final thoughts” over at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
