Search for: "Grant v. Mueller" Results 241 - 260 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In response, the defendant is required to show that the plaintiff "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney's breach of this duty proximately caused [the defendant] to sustain actual and ascertainable damages" (Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650 [2010] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
But Judge Koh's cherished "Groundhog Day" principle is that what wasn't allowed at previous Apple v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am by Anthony Zaller
Mueller of the Eastern District of California issued a temporary restraining order barring enforcement of AB 51. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am by Anthony Zaller
Mueller of the Eastern District of California issued a temporary restraining order barring enforcement of AB 51. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Florian Mueller
The announcement also mentioned a companion complaint filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego (this post continues below the document): 17-07-06 Qualcomm v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's court in the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document):19-08-15 Joint Case Managem... by Florian Mueller on ScribdThe next important date in this case is August 21. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
Food and Drug Administration announced the revocation of its emergency use authorization for chloroquine and hydroxychlorine (HCQ).[1] The FDA had originally granted the emergency use authorization for HCQ, on March 28, 2020, but its continued review found that the drug was “unlikely to be effective at treating COVID-19” and the potential risks of HCQ use outweigh any potential benefits. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 7:12 am by Brian Cordery
IPCom’s patent relates to a method for controlling whether a particular mobile device is granted authorisation to access a given telecommunications channel at a given time. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Dec. 4, 2020) and a request to block the certification of the state vote (Mueller v. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Sabrina McCubbin summarized Jewel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Timothy Edgar argued that Mueller’s indictment of Russian hackers will not make Russia behave in the same way that the 2014 indictment of Chinese hackers in United States v. [read post]