Search for: "Greenfield v. Greenfield"
Results 241 - 260
of 554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2008, 8:34 am
(His defense counsel is a friend, Scott Greenfield of Simple Justice fame.) [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Greenfield v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna is a defendant in the notorious case of Rakofsky v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:34 am
If anyone else has ever seen such a thing from a state's highest court, I'd love to hear about it.The decision is reproduced in full below (Scott Greenfield, loved the caption, People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:51 am
, Right v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:21 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:00 am
Washington Post, et al., better known as Rakofsky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
Under these circumstances, NYCM is not collaterally estopped from litigating the merits of the underlying action, as it was not provided "a full and fair opportunity to contest the decision now said to be controlling" (Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 199, quoting Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 304, cert denied 535 US 1096). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:43 pm
If you want the real analysis of the implications of Padilla for criminal lawyers, read Greenfield at Simple Justice. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Because the arbitral findings establish as a matter of law that defendants were not the cause of plaintiff's losses, the motion court properly dismissed plaintiff's complaint (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 43 AD3d 680, 682 [2007], affd 11 NY3d 195 [2008]). [read post]
9 May 2010, 5:55 pm
It held that one of the defendants had qualified immunity as to damage claims.In Greenfield v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Moreover, since the issue of MEI's capacity to commence an action was not determined on appeal, collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation of that issue (see Tydings v Greenfield, Stein & Senior, LLP, 11 NY3d 195, 200; Sabbatini v Galati, 43 AD3d 1136; Bergstol v Town of Monroe, 305 AD2d 348). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
N.A. v Cutler, 112 AD3d 573). [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:11 pm
Most notably, he has filed a lawsuit against nearly every legal blogger who wrote about or commented on the story, casting about so broadly that Scott Greenfield, one of the first of the blogging defendants to be served, promptly nicknamed the case Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
