Search for: "HATCH v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927) and TransCore, LP v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Matt Osenga
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm by Matthew Flinn
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
This week a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an important decision for consumers in Alaska and other western states. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 4:43 am
" The lengthy analysis ends with:Perhaps most damning of all, the standing doctrine does not even accomplish its stated ends, as Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
 Student V would never have been in the position to be suspended or expelled as he would not have had to hatch a plan to defend himself. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:45 am by Holman
An example of this appears in the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Genentech v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
BPCIA is, in a broad sense, intended to be the analog of the Hatch-Waxman Act for biologic drugs. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
Here's Mark Walsh at SCOTUSblog reporting on the big oral argument on the last day of the 2017 Term — Trump v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am by David Doniger
  For these reasons, it would be wrong for the Supreme Court to count these chickens before they hatch. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:33 am by Andrew Trask
This week's case is Reliable Money Order Inc v McKnight Sales Co Inc, which serves as a companion case to Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
 The Hatch-Waxman setup involved Mylan preparing and filing its abbreviated new drug application that created a cause of action for infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2). [read post]