Search for: "HATCH v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court, in one of its most historical decisions, Marbury v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 4:43 am
" The lengthy analysis ends with:Perhaps most damning of all, the standing doctrine does not even accomplish its stated ends, as Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
United States; Bens v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:45 am
An example of this appears in the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Genentech v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:10 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Oliphant v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm
BPCIA is, in a broad sense, intended to be the analog of the Hatch-Waxman Act for biologic drugs. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
For these reasons, it would be wrong for the Supreme Court to count these chickens before they hatch. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
Sensebe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:33 am
This week's case is Reliable Money Order Inc v McKnight Sales Co Inc, which serves as a companion case to Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
The Hatch-Waxman setup involved Mylan preparing and filing its abbreviated new drug application that created a cause of action for infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
LaVoice v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:29 pm
Please see Hart Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:23 am
This post (by correctly explaining how Karl Rove's recent GOP strategy PowerPoint (.pdf) violated the Hatch Act by being presented on federal property) intrigued me. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:47 pm
Company v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
It gives FDA authority to impose post-marketing requirements on PANDA holders, and it could expose them to state tort liability by removing them from the Pliva v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
So the patents are, for now, not completely immune to the attack as stated by Allergan's press release (although a different deal and parties could take a different position which could make the sovereign immunity v federal court position a bit murkier). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:48 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
