Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943). [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:23 am
As a consequence scholars knew very little about the Court’s internal deliberations in the landmark cases of its 1936 October Term.This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Jones, Hughes v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:09 am
The Second Circuit rejected a broad reading of Hugh v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes states that the acid test should be whether the application is in substance (impermissibly) to vary or alter the final order or whether it is (permissibly) to support it by working out how it should be carried into effect [54]. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:45 am
Bastien v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
There was a wide margin of appreciation left to member states in the realm of parliamentary law. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:53 am
There are some sticky issues under the US Supreme Court decision, Keller v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
In NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
Following the publications complained of he felt compelled to, and did, make a formal announcement as to his true state of health both to the Board of the Company and to its workforce [43]. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
Hughes explained: It cannot be doubted that the power to provide for extradition is a national power; it pertains to the national government, and not to the states. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
By Hugh B. [read post]
