Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 10:26 am
ISSUE Whether the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked authority to modify Owens' sentence pursuant to Ind. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Superior Courtof New Jersey – Appellate Division: Roberts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 pm
Western Pacific Housing, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on two issues: whether the en banc Ninth Circuit properly applied Malley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
In 2000, the House of Lords effectively approved these conditions, in the landmark case on the point - Inco Europe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
" The Franza v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
In debate, a member shall be called to order by the Speaker if he or she: … Matters sub judice (g) Refers to any matter that is the subject of a proceeding, (i) that is pending in a court or before a judge for judicial determination; or (ii) that is before any quasi-judicial body constituted by the House or by or under the authority of an Act of the Legislature, where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Speaker that further reference would create a real and… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
I generally like the published opinions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:15 am
In 1803, in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
” The House argues that our decision in Moffitt v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:32 pm
The court also cited Buchwald v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
After being convicted in district court, the defendant appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of simple assault. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Supreme Court issued Roper v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am
Norwich orders were introduced in the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:45 pm
On March 2, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
