Search for: "In Re First Federal Corp."
Results 241 - 260
of 3,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
United States, No. 98-419L (Court of Federal Claims, Jan. 23, 2009), a massive opinion (84 single-spaced pages) with what at first glance seems to delve into just about every regulatory takings theory known: temporary takings, categorical takings, partial takings, parcel-as-a-whole, Mahon, Penn Central, First English, Lucas, Tahoe-Sierra, Seiber, delay, and ripeness. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Talevski appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:23 am
The first GVR asked the Federal Circuit to review its pro-patentability decision based upon Mayo v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:57 am
Bayer Corp. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
” In re Authentidate Holding Corp. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
GraphOn Corp. [read post]
E.D.N.Y. Notes Split Re Proper Rule 12 Clause for Dismissing Claims Based on Forum Selection Clauses
30 Jan 2007, 5:07 am
" Asoma Corp. v. [read post]
E.D.N.Y. Notes Split Re Proper Rule 12 Clause for Dismissing Claims Based on Forum Selection Clauses
30 Jan 2007, 12:11 am
" Asoma Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:53 pm
I believe an answer lies in the 26-year-old decision of the Former Fifth Circuit in In re Plywood Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 9:45 pm
The Williams Restaurant Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1292, (CAFC 1991). [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:59 pm
by Dennis Crouch Phil-Insul Corp. [read post]
26 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
" In re Bose Corp., Serial No. 74734496 (July 12, 2005) [not citable]. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:11 am
Stryker Corp., No. 09-cv-3695 (S.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:05 pm
Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:51 am
The Bottom Line: In re DPH Holdings Corp., Case No. 10-4170-bk, 2011 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:00 am
See, e.g., In re Susser Holdings Corp. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:05 pm
Corp., (10/26/15). [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:45 am
A federal court has rejected class certification in the multidistrict litigation concerning McDonald's Corp.'s french fries. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
The Court of Federal Claims rejected the Government’s argument that Pioneer Reserve’s breach of contract claim should be dismissed because Pioneer Reserve, located in Alaska, which entered into a “mitigation banking agreement” pursuant to the regulations implemented by the Corps of Engineers, did not in fact, have a contract with the federal government. [read post]
