Search for: "In Re Osborne"
Results 241 - 260
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 11:44 pm
Otherwise, you're left with those who stay at the crisp extremes.Basically, I like the sort of liberal(ish) Republican that can succeed in a blue state, and the point of the column is to show that their convoluted statements are not as ridiculous as they appear on first read.The second letter is from Nancy N. [read post]
12 May 2007, 9:00 am
Next stop, a few miles over to Bellevue, was LexisNexis, where Marc Osborne (left) had organized a fast-paced but very thorough presentation on recent developments within the litigation services programs, including LN Applied Discovery, CourtLink, Concordance, CaseMap, etc. -- all with baseball-themed PowerPoints. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 2:29 pm
Where better to re-publish a company Facebook policy or cross-post details of the company's Christmas party than via Facebook? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:48 am
Osborne, 11 Wall. 516, 546 (1871) (a patent may be “so interspersed with technical terms and terms of art that the testimony of scientific witnesses is indispensable to a correct understanding of its meaning”). [read post]
30 May 2010, 11:32 am
George Osborne, as yet, does not have this expertise. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
This is just awful, that we are so inured to playing the technical aspects of law that we fail to be able to state loudly and clearly what we're trying to do. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:45 pm
"I think they're too stringent. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Osborne Professor of Law. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
So we’re just looking at what the statute meant then. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Ct. 2006). [7] In re IBP Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
Osborne Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:37 am
" Just mentioning a name, however, might not be enough: "So if you're saying your wife's name and you're just mentioning her name, I don't know that I could consider that personally directed. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Thus is the common law is resurrected, statutes and ancient charters deemed “constitutional”, old legal rules become fundamental principles, and rights discourse is de-Europeanised, re-patriated and re-branded as embodying the une certaine idée de l’Angleterre (or sometimes, even, de l’Ecosse). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Maybe we’re not, right? [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Osborn, 447 S.W.3d 390, 394 (Tex. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
Gary Osborne, who chairs BASCA's Ivor Novello Awards, said this of streaming royalties: "No matter how bad it is for the [recording] artists it's a whole lot worse for the writers! [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
" Once the prerogative of theconsumer, confusion is nowa matter for the judge ...The Court then cited cases including esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line [2008] RPC 34, Re GE Trade Mark [1973] RPC 297 and Gut Springenheide GmbH v Oberkreisdirektor des Kreises Steinfurt (Case C-210/96) from which it was clear that the ultimate issue of confusion is one for the judge, rather than witnesses, but that a judge can reach the conclusion in the absence of evidence from consumers… [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:45 pm
Osborne Professor of Law, and Pam Karlan, the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law, interviewed Sklansky. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 12:59 pm
Osborne Professor of Law. [read post]
