Search for: "In re HICKS" Results 241 - 260 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Critics suggest it is nothing more than a re-branded PCC enabling the press to carry on as before. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:12 am
  Don't have the knee-jerk lawyer reaction of showing how you paid close attention in first year crimlaw and subsumed the myths that we're taught to accept as truths. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm by Javier Dominguez
The case is In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, case number 1:15-md-02599, in the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:00 am by Clara Spera
Though Manning has previously been diagnosed with gender dysphoria twice by army behavioral specialists, army policy requires that prisoners be re-evaluated when they are moved to a new facility. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
”They’re running around on the streets administering these heavy-duty medications that could be lethal,” said Honey Gutzalenko, a nurse whose husband died after he was injected with midazolam in 2021 while restrained by police near San Francisco. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
We’re seeking candidates who excel in relationship- building, are results-oriented, and have strong research and analytical skills. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Guest Blogger
McKnight re-entered the University of Texas in the fall semester of 1946, completed his B.A. degree in May 1947, and applied for a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford University. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Kathleen Hicks will moderate the discussion. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:23 am by Seán Binder
Raimondo earlier this year said that if the administration banned TikTok, “you’re going to literally lose every voter under 35, forever. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
   The challenges of the internet and protecting privacy (in this case the identity of a child) were considered by Sir James Munby in Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam): “First, the internet allows anyone, effectively at the click of a mouse, to publish whatever they wish to the entire world – or at least to everyone who has access to the internet. [read post]