Search for: "In the Matter of the Adoption of Baby T" Results 241 - 260 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 10:47 am by Kysa Crusco
The show ended its second season with a courtroom custody drama titled “I want my baby back, baby back, baby back. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
But the guy's not a radical no matter what Newt Gingrich says. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:19 pm by piperhoffman
But we needn’t look to the most intelligent species or to those closest to us biologically for examples of altruism, or of the “ethical” choices that we “ought” to make: trans-species adoptive mothers (who not only protect but even suckle babies orphaned or rejected by their own mothers) that we know of include a tiger, sheep, monkey, gorilla, and many dogs and cats. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 7:52 am
  Dating selection seems an area where it is pretty clear we don't want the law to intervene, perhaps because we think it powerless to do so. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
While the Court thus had the power to suspend the 2015 LCFS regulations, it ultimately held it would not do so because of the same “baby-with-the-bathwater problem” that prompted its unusual POET I remedial order voiding the CARB’s “approval” but leaving the original LCFS regulations in place. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This, in conjunction with federal efforts to adopt standards for non-GMO labeling and market research into a reasonable consumer’s interpretation of non-GMO supported the claim that a reasonable consumer would be deceived. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Stephen Page
His Honour said that the State Act did not apply, because it was hardly relevant to the matter- when the child was born overseas.2016- in the Baby Gammy case, the judge said that the intended parents were not parents because the parenting presumption for a couple  under the Family Law Act did not apply to surrogacy, but the State Act meant that the surrogate was a parent (and therefore so was her husband). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:26 am by Robert B. Lamm
  While stockholders get to vote on truly major matters, such as the sale of the company, they don’t get to vote on most matters affecting profitability, such as how capital should be allocated and what new products and markets to pursue. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 3:31 am by SHG
Then there are the old school businesses that have adopted tech. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:49 am by SHG
Which it is doesn’t really matter; there are clearly reasons to suggest that there is a sound basis for either view. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
ICWA requires the state to seek an Indian family to adopt where possible, but private adoption agencies don’t get paid unless an adoption with a paying family goes through. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:26 am by SHG
  In the sex discrimination lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged that he or she was denied a promotion after taking six weeks of paid parental leave to care for an adopted baby. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
  In that case, the United States Supreme Court dealt with the status of twin babies who were born out of wedlock to parents who both were enrolled members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (Tribe) as well as residents and domiciliaries of the Choctaw Reservation.[16]  On January 10, 1986, the twins’ mother deliberately gave birth to the twins in a county some 200 miles from the reservation and executed a consent-to-adoption form in that same… [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Rania Combs
Otherwise it can become a set of outdated documents that don’t accomplish your objectives or protect the people in your life that matter most. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:24 pm by Lucy Reed
I can certainly recall attending a quiz several years ago where participants had to guess the High Court Judge from the baby photo (I know – don’t ask!). [read post]