Search for: "LEHMAN v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 3:48 pm
Zamora v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Thus, the Office would be required to provide independent periodic reports to Congress on the state of the financial system. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
The state of the law makes that difficult today. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:53 pm
East West Resort Development V, L.P., L.L.L.P. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
http://tinyurl.com/yho6hyl Grunstein v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:39 am
However, in a recent Delaware Supreme Court decision, Gantler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:50 am
Fifth Circuit Makes a Hash of the Climate Change Case: As I noted in a prior post, the October 2009 Fifth Circuit opinion in the Comer v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:35 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
(all) Amicus brief of the Cato Institute et al. (09-988) Amicus brief of eight states (09-991) Title: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:02 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Congressman Luis V. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:08 pm
“Traditionally, securities market regulation and law enforcement relied upon a ‘three legged stool’ of the SEC, federal and state attorneys general and investor actions. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Petersburg, Florida v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:28 am
Given the similarities in the legal theories alleged by the plaintiffs in all three cases, Judge Kaplan granted the motions to dismiss in both Tsereteli and Indymac for the reasons stated in his written opinion for In re: Lehman Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
The California-based Specialty Wine Retailers Association had challenged the Texas law to enable consumers to buy wine from out-of-state retailers. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
But shareholders should have tools and rights that would enable them to secure such a state of affairs. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Currently, there is no system in place to responsibly shut down a failing financial company like AIG or Lehman Brothers. [read post]
