Search for: "Marks v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 241 - 260
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice,… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 2:42 pm
App. 2016), and it is the decision of the Florida District Court of Appeal for the Fourth District (the appeals court), of a decision initially made by the Broward County Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial District (the trial court). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
– EFF asks judge to dismiss two defendants from mass movie-downloading suits (EFF) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court ND California: Edge Games crashes in trademark suit against Electronic Arts (TTABlog) [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
Very unsettling 9th Circuit "Betty Boop" decision on copyright and trademark in BETTY BOOP character
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
In response, the defendants not only raised the argument on which they defeated that chain of title theory at the district court, but also an alternative ground for affirming the district court’s dismissal (one they hadn’t raised at the district court). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm
The court of appeals will be interested in the same questions as the district court at first—why should we care? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Of course, there is still the question whether the restriction caused by these seditious offences is no more than necessary to limit the right to freedom of expression and of publication, etc. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 6:42 pm
The district court disagreed, and so do we. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
As the First District Court of Appeals stated in Dobbins v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
As the First District Court of Appeals stated in Dobbins v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
As the First District Court of Appeals stated in Dobbins v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Janicke, The Imminent Outpouring from the Eastern District of Texas, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2017) (Janicke.2017.Venue) Mark A. [read post]
Bypassing the telecoms: 'Stingrays' allow direct government phone surveillance with little oversight
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm
The SCOTUS cases US v Karo and Kyollo v US are the closest to being on point, he said. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:03 am
Global Global – General Guidelines for securing open source software (EFF) Global – Copyright A game we all win: Dumping DRM can increase sales while reducing piracy (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) (Michael Geist) PK In the Know podcast (Microsoft deal to get TV on your Xbox, ACTA review etc) (Public Knowledge) Anti-piracy company pirates Deus Ex in controversial experiment (TorrentFreak) iCopyright article tools for WordPress (PlagiarismToday) Global –… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:59 am
Michael Hayes v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm
V. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:56 pm
Does 1 (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions Google gets good results in three adwords trademark cases: Jurin, Flowbee, Dazzlesmile (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court dismisses Tiffany’s final claim against eBay: Tiffany (NJ) Inc. and Tiffany and Company v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
What followed were comments about his profile on his webpage, etc. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm
The Court’s ruling In the light of the above, the Amsterdam District Court ordered Google to remove the link. [read post]
