Search for: "Marshall v. Johnson" Results 241 - 260 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Constitution, has compiled the following list of Supreme Court decisions dealing with the constitutional parameters of the right of counsel:   1938 Johnson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The modern version of the committee confirmation process, with senators pressing nominees on their judicial views, started in 1955 when southern Dixiecrats wanted to grill John Marshall Harlan about his view of the court’s decision the previous year striking down school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, the first casebooks in constitutional law, at the turn of the 20th century, began with treatments of constitutional amendment inasmuch as their authors correctly recognized, as John Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
’ ” Stevens’ thoughts no doubt reminded some observers of his dissent in the 1989 case, Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thurgood Marshall, named by Johnson in 1967, would turn out to be the last Democratic nominee for a full quarter century, and then Bill Clinton got only two appointments in his eight years of office (as did Barack Obama). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:48 am by Jeff Gamso
  We as a people disagree about what's included in speech, for instance (see, e.g., Texas v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:35 pm by Steve Gottlieb
He continued: “It would treat a Dixiecrat Senator’s decision to vote against Thurgood Marshall’s confirmation in order to keep African Americans off the Supreme Court as on a par with President Johnson’s evaluation of his nominee’s race as a positive factor. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Sixty Famous Cases 10 v. (1956) Van Winkle, Marshall. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Matthew Scarola
Johnson note that in United States v. [read post]