Search for: "Marshall v. Johnson" Results 241 - 260 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 11:59 am by JB
These are both appropriate answers.However, let me add a third answer.The power to regulate, as Chief Justice John Marshall said in Gibbons v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:03 pm by Brandon Bartels
Chief Justice Warren famously sought, and attained, consensus on perhaps the most important Supreme Court decision, Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, the first casebooks in constitutional law, at the turn of the 20th century, began with treatments of constitutional amendment inasmuch as their authors correctly recognized, as John Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:25 am by Brandon Bartels
Indeed, since President Johnson put Thurgood Marshall on the Court in 1967 (Johnson’s last appointment), 12 out of the last 16 justices have been appointed by Republican presidents. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 (So did Justices Marshall and Blackmun.) [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Constitution, has compiled the following list of Supreme Court decisions dealing with the constitutional parameters of the right of counsel:   1938 Johnson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The modern version of the committee confirmation process, with senators pressing nominees on their judicial views, started in 1955 when southern Dixiecrats wanted to grill John Marshall Harlan about his view of the court’s decision the previous year striking down school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
’ ” Stevens’ thoughts no doubt reminded some observers of his dissent in the 1989 case, Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 9:20 am by Quinta Jurecic
  Also on the topic of going dark, Ben linked us to Marshall Erwin’s essay on the subject over at Just Security. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thurgood Marshall, named by Johnson in 1967, would turn out to be the last Democratic nominee for a full quarter century, and then Bill Clinton got only two appointments in his eight years of office (as did Barack Obama). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:48 am by Jeff Gamso
  We as a people disagree about what's included in speech, for instance (see, e.g., Texas v. [read post]