Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 241 - 260
of 806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2011, 7:00 pm
by Kenneth Anderson I’m traveling and can’t stop to comment, but check out Charlie Savage’s New York Times story describing the secret DOJ memo, reportedly principally authored by David Barron and Marty Lederman, that provided the justification for putting Anwar Al-Awlaki on the targeting list in the first place. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’m traveling and can’t stop to comment, but check out Charlie Savage’s New York Times story describing a secret DOJ memo, reportedly principally authored by David Barron and Marty Lederman, that provided the justification for putting Anwar Al-Awlaki on the targeting list in the first place. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:13 am
Commentary and analysis on the case come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization (with a follow-up post yesterday), Elizabeth Wydra at The Huffington Post, and Judith Schaeffer at The Huffington Post. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Anderson: Marty Lederman’s Fundamental Mistake of Law Bruce Ackerman I have learned a lot from Marty Lederman over the years, so I was surprised to find that Part 1 of his “User’s Guide to Trump v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Marty Lederman, Padilla (Sept. 9, 2005)9. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
Marty Lederman and I have been engaged in a debate over the past few weeks, and last Monday he wrote a lengthy and thoughtful “Monday Reflection” over at Just Security concerning some of my arguments here at Lawfare and in my article, Folk International Law. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:21 pm
Via Marty Lederman and scotusblog, the Congressional Research Service has just issued a comprehensive report on the Congress' contempt power. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:24 am
My thanks to Marty Lederman for reminding me of this brilliant but now somewhat neglected piece. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
At Just Security, Marty Lederman adds to his analysis of the decision with parts five, six, and seven of his series; Marty also discusses the case in a podcast with Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:54 pm
As Marty Lederman notes, on August 2, there will be marriage equality in D.C. and 13 states--California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota (where a new law takes effect August 1), New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 5:17 pm
In a comment, Marty Lederman expressed his view: The big question here is not the War Powers Resolution, but the Constitution. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:19 am
" In that post over at the Balkinization blog, Georgetown's Marty Lederman wrote that although he was "horrified by what DOJ approved and what the CIA has done" - that is, the subjection of so-called high-value detainees to simulated suffocation in the course of interrogation - he does not "find it so surprising, or objectionable, that DOJ would not think of prosecuting the CIA operatives and contractors, even though" Marty's been a… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
” Other coverage of Moore’s actions comes from Mike Cason of Al.com; commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
" And in commentary, at "Just Security," Marty Lederman has a blog post titled "The President Resuscitates the Entry Ban: Where Should the Court Go From Here? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:48 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm
Anderson)”: Marty Lederman has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 7:40 am
" And at the "Just Security" blog, Marty Lederman has a post titled "Judge Chutkan's Ruling on the Unidentified U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
” Marty Lederman had this pre-cert. grant post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Marty Lederman (Balkinization) blogs about an indictment that raises very important First Amendment issues. [read post]
