Search for: "Massey v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
After stating the amounts or percentages allowable on sums distributed by the trustee that are less than one million dollars, §326 says that the court can award the trustee “reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all monies disbursed or turned over in the case to parties in interest, excluding the debtor [i.e., excluding Madoff]. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:20 pm
Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Kelly issued a press release yesterday, praising the United States Supreme Court for its decision in Caperton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:32 pm
Massey Coal Co. on Monday, C.J. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
The Seattle Times reports on a new Supreme Court decision announced yesterday in Caperton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:09 am by Robert L Abell
This question arises from judicial campaign contributions and the escalating expenses of state judicial campaigns and the Supreme Court answered it Monday in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:01 pm by Brian M. Peterson
The United States Supreme Court held today by a 5-4 vote in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:53 pm
Massey Coal Co., holding that due process requires a state judge to recuse himself from a case involving the financial interests of a party who has made substantial donations to the judge's campaign for the bench. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
Massey Coal Company Inc., et al., the majority made a landmark decision (5-4) regarding the position of state supreme court judges in cases involving parties that have contributed to their campaigns. [read post]