Search for: "Matter of Farrell"
Results 241 - 260
of 358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Co. v Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
This story matters a lot, not only because of the actual change that these three individuals brought about, but also because it reminds us how lucky we are to live in a country where the people have the power to challenge the unfairness of government action and change it. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
© 2010 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 10:08 am
Farrell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 3:48 am
Thank you for coming in and being a reasonable adult about this matter. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:21 am
See, Prince, Richardson on Evidence Sec. 8-219, at 529 [Farrell 11th ed]. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:00 am
” “The April 30 date was a function of our board schedule and was unintentional,” Constance Farrell, a spokesperson for Horvath, told The Times on Tuesday. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
Related PostsJune 28, 2010 -- McKechnie for Supreme Court (0)June 23, 2010 -- Guest Contribution: Farrell on Foy Case (0) [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
© 2012 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:00 am
The decision is of interest primarily because it directs an award of Rothko damages -- named after the New York Court of Appeals' decision in Matter of Rothko, 43 NY2d 305 (1977) -- calculated as the difference between the actual sale price and the value of the asset or interest at the time of the trial as opposed to the time of the transaction at issue. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fr [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:00 am
© 2011 Farrell Fritz, PC. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
A reduced is justifiable as a matter of public policy given the compensatory purposes stated under Division 2 of the Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am
Farrell v. [read post]