Search for: "Miller v. Municipal Court" Results 241 - 260 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Change to ‘consisting of’ language during reexam limits damages: Kim v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:40 am by SHG
Driver on photography rights, showed up and was advised that the municipal judge had issued an order prohibiting photography in the court building. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
Municipalities can, of course, find more favorable decisions if they look for them. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
(forthcoming) Amicus brief of the American Legion Miller v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
(forthcoming) Amicus brief of the American Legion   Miller v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Herrera v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 pm by KC Johnson
” Nifong and Wilson claimed absolute prosecutorial immunity, but “the Supreme Court [in Buckley v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
OPR proposes to amend this section to provide guidance to public agencies in applying the principles set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
’ Cambodia The Phnom Penh Municipal Court is moving ahead with a criminal defamation claim filed by Prime Minister Hun Sen against former opposition leader, Sam Rainsy. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
”[25]  A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]