Search for: "People v. Griffin" Results 241 - 260 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Big Tent Democrat
Griffin, supra; on interferences with political organizations, see Stromberg v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that publicly urging people to fire someone for his speech, even when the firing would be illegal, is likely constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
As pointed out by justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Venkat
" Related posts: "Maryland Supreme Court Rejects "Circumstantial Authentication" Standard for MySpace Evidence -- Griffin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Both are great guys, and very smart people, too. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
There's more on this case on the firm's website at Citigroup’s Mathur Said to Depart With Hybrid Traders as Pandit Cuts Jobs By Donal Griffin - Dec 9, 2011 Citigroup Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Pandit, who took the top job in December 2007, disbanded part of the hybrid team in 2008 and began to wind down the structuring side of the business, the people said. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
But the Establishment Clause right to be free from coercion of religious practice remains.Indeed, many courts have held that letting inmates get extra privileges or reduce their sentences by going to Alcoholics Anonymous violates the Establishment Clause (see, among many other cases, Griffin v. [read post]