Search for: "People v Flowers" Results 241 - 260 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
Wimberly said.In one Mississippi case, a black man, Curtis Flowers, was sentenced to death in 2004 for killing four furniture store employees. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 15-7553, Flowers v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Charles V, Ferdinand and Isabella’s grandson, added a Renaissance place to the center of the compound [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
The majority on the 8th Circuit panel cited and agreed with a 3rd Circuit ruling — U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:14 am
  It may be bad enough for the innocent defendant to find himself in the position of facing prison for something he didn't do, but to face an even longer stretch, multiplying bad to unbelievably horrible, for something he didn't do is unfathomable to many people. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
We've seen twice before what happens when plaintiffs start to get squeezed by preemption - during the initial flowering of the preemption defense in medical device cases that was snuffed out by Medtronic v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]