Search for: "People v. Doctor"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm
The Court’s decision in June Medical v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:03 pm
When most people think of a medical malpractice case, they think about the kind of case in which the plaintiff (the party bringing the case) claims that a doctor of hosptial has acted below the standard of care and caused significnat injury in a patient. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Meade v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 5:12 am
The case, Zion v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:00 am
Such a threat can only drive doctors away from treating pregnant Georgians. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm
” In Home Star Bank and Financial Services v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm
” In Home Star Bank and Financial Services v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 8:31 pm
PIN ET AL. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
In this case it seems to me that the relevant standard is the same whether it is derived from the standards of reasonable and honest doctors or reasonable and honest people. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Daum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:11 am
(v) Can no longer stay focused on normal activities? [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:36 pm
(v) Can no longer stay focused on normal activities? [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
The case is Nielson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 11:19 am
In Lancaster v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:49 pm
This is clearly illustrated in the recent case of ERP Operating v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
In today’s case (Hendry v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 7:28 pm
(Gersten v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
