Search for: "People v. Ring"
Results 241 - 260
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
But this latest version would still allow people who boycott to be slapped with criminal financial penalties. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:37 pm
Corporations and individuals will now think twice before unauthorized usage of other people’s images. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
The prize -- to remind readers -- is complimentary registration, complete with a free lunch, at CLT's conference this Wednesday, 29 October, "Intellectual Property: the 'no patents' round-up for non-techie people", organised by CLT and held in Central London [it's still not too late to sign up for this joyous event, even if you're not the winner of this competition ...].The pain. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 7:50 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Florida, 14-7505, a capital case involving the murder of the manager of a Florida Popeye’s restaurant, asks two questions: (1) whether a penalty-phase jury has a constitutional obligation to render a verdict on whether the defendant is intellectually disabled when evidence has been presented to support such a conclusion; and (2) whether Ring v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The speech focuses on the international role of the ICO, convergence issues and people centric approaches to data. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
CAAF ruled 3-2 in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 6:35 am
In discussing United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
That's unfathomable, really.Appleseed's recommendations will ring familiar to Grits readers:(1) End jail bookings for Class C misdemeanors.(2) End most jail bookings for offenses eligible for citation.(3) Quickly release most people after jail booking on personal bond.(4) Implement diversion programs.(5) Analyze local data to develop local solutions to reduce jail use.Grits is delighted to see so much additional data produced about Class C misdemeanor arrests just before… [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm
Motley Crue’s “Drum Ring” Isn’t Stolen Trade Secret King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
” The ability to silence unknown calls helps “to automatically screen out spam, scams, and calls from unknown people” and will not cause the phone to ring but will appear in a user’s call list. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
Politicians know that people collectively are dumb. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
Labunski (Call #KF4555.L33 2000) which looks at Article V of the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
Z.M. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
If that rings a bell for you, it’s either tinnitus or because the Court already invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
The Court agreed – as Sir Robin Jacob explained:[16] “The purpose of the section is to make people register relevant transactions timeously. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:13 am
There's no poetic ring to that. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 9:19 am
CDW discussed the case in : An Eighth Circuit oddity: USA v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
" The case, U.S. v. [read post]
