Search for: "Perry v. Brown" Results 241 - 260 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 6:24 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
what a silly lawsuit: "School 'failed to get me into law'" pjblack.me/JUcuCd this is a good idea: "Facebook Launches Separate App For Managing Pages" pjblack.me/JU8zVU a good piece on why the us supreme court should affirm perry v brown on narrow grounds only: "Salvaging Perry" pjblack.me/J8Pxfy our eating habits deteriorate as the day goes on: "Infographic: When The Lights Go Out, The World Eats… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
” He notes the roughly ten years between Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am by William Carleton
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
(Anything by Earle Stanley Gardner (Perry Mason); his stories were part of the reason I became a lawyer. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:27 pm by nflatow
What is the impact of the court’s opinion on the pending Perry v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  Until now, she has, by virtue of her brief tenure as Solicitor General, defended the constitutionality of California's referendum outlawing gay marriage in the Perry v Schwarzenneger case.She really had no choice but to join that momentous fight on the side of upholding the California ban on gay marriage. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Proposition 8 case (Perry v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Attorney for State: Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Filter Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
One black and one brown belt are sufficient. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am by Linda McClain
  These cases played a starring role in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Perry v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That day fell on the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]