Search for: "Philip Morris USA Inc" Results 241 - 260 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
With respect to plaintiff's demand for punitive damages, defendant specifically incorporates by reference any and all standards or limitations regarding the determination and enforceability of punitive damage awards that are set forth in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm by Christa Culver
Catholic Diocese of LansingDocket: 10-760Issue(s): (1) Whether the ministerial exception grounded in the First Amendment bars employees of religious institutions, from asserting a state civil rights claim where the employment action does not involve selection of employees or an examination of church doctrine; (2) whether an employee of a religious institution who is found to be a ministerial employee should be barred from bringing a state whistleblowers' action.Certiorari stage… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Michelle Yeary
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2011 WL 5119441 at *7 (6th Cir. 2011) (vacating order denying remand finding that trial court “went beyond the relevant inquiry—whether Plaintiffs have a colorable claim under Kentucky law—and instead inquired whether Plaintiffs had adequate evidentiary support for their claim, the traditional Rule 56 inquiry. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Foods, Inc., 533 U.S. 405 (2001), and corporations generally have free speech rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Techdirt), Microsoft Research launches new tools for knowledge sharing: (creativecommons.org), Yet another star singer, Duffy, doesn’t mind file-sharing: (Techdirt)   Events 20 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Melbourne: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 21 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Canberra: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 22 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Sydney:… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 837 A.2d 534, 541 (Pa. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The most recent case the Supreme Court has decided on the issue of the constitutionality of punitive damages is Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That is the case of Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
But yesterday, in what Mauro calls a "surprise"  decision, the Supreme Court ruled 5-to-4 that Frederick's clients should be able to bring a state lawsuit claiming that Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris USA, fraudulently advertised the benefits of "light" cigarettes. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Tuesday, the Supreme Court holds a one-hour oral argument on the biggest class-action lawsuit in decades, involving the job policies of the huge discount retailer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Post Grant Opposition) 'In US, expert witnesses are partisan' article by Adam Liptak (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Seventh Circuit's American Jury Project (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US General - Decisions Merrill Lunch & Co brokerage arm wins partial injunction against former financial advisor Sharon M Kurgis accused of stealing clients (Law360) US General - Lawsuits and strategic steps American Power… [read post]