Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 1:38 pm by Gene Quinn
Comments may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Patent Board, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Phillips, 12-544 and its prisoner-on-top counterpart Phillips v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC noted: The assignments, how- ever, make the relevant comparison between the claims of the ’516 patent, which define the inventions claimed therein, Phillips v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm by WSLL
Ann. § 14-2-309(a)(v).II. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court has already—unanimously—held that an economic boycott based on race, namely a boycott of white-owned businesses, is a constitutionally protected form of protest. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting and influential passage, most recently quoted by Judge Posner in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Ben
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am by Florian Mueller
Motorola dispute] addressed the consolidated patent infringement lawsuit" during the course of appellate proceedings before the Ninth Circuit last year, but anyone can listen to an official recording the appeals court made available on the Internet, which contains the following discussion between Ninth Circuit Judge Marsha Berzon and Microsoft counsel Carter Phillips (Sidley & Austin) at a September 11, 2012 hearing (unofficial transcript attached to a Microsoft filing made… [read post]