Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 241 - 260 of 18,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
The patents are owned by Mr Philip Price of Preston and licensed to Mr Price's company, Surpawall. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[2] The Government must perform cost analysis analysis when cost or pricing data are required and may perform cost analysis to evaluate information other than cost or pricing data when it is not possible to determine a fair and reasonable price through price analysis alone.[3] Cost analysis is frequently performed, and the Cost Principles frequently apply, in pricing both fixed-price and cost-reimbursement contracts. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:24 am by msW1Ld
On May 4, 2012, the Kansas Supreme Court held in O’Brien v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of People of the State of New York v Tyson Foods, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am by Cinthia Macie
  In particular, as seen in the Third Circuit’s decision as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:10 am by Cinthia Macie
  In particular, as seen in the Third Circuit’s decision as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:45 am by Jon Hyman
Congratulations to Kristen ten Brink (@onthe10brink on Twitter), who submitted the winning bid to Medical Costs Price Is Right: The actual retail price of a 19-day at the Cleveland Clinic, including all procedures, labs, doctors, etc., is $106,885.10, which is at least half of what I expected. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 1:30 pm
Part IV analyses various licensing practices that may allegedly amount to abuses of a dominant position with a specific focus on price discrimination and what EC law refers to as "excessive" pricing. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 12:32 pm
Nowadays, though, I'm down with that.With the understanding that some other readers might react negatively to it.With that in mind, what do you think about these two sentences from Justice Earl:"Over a year later, on November 14, 2023, the superior court held a hearing in which it considered anew the issue of Price’s suitability for conditional release, based on new circumstances. [read post]